I cannot join any online art community. Inevitably there is a viewing of work and everyone digs deep to come up with something positive to say, "Great use of color!" (too bad your picture is ugly.) Everyone is slapping each other on their paint-splattered virtual backs. Oh, STOP. I much prefer it if someone tells the truth about what they are seeing.
If all work has value then how can anything really be "good"? Don't you need a "bad" to judge it by?
I'm all down with the process over product yadda-yadda-ya. You need that darn process to make the damn product. Just because the creation of it had meaning to the artist personally does not mean it must have merit for the viewing public at large.
Here is a kinda bad painting. |
"This part is good but WHAT is going on in that corner?"
"Right. I am having a hard time there."
"I can see that."
Those conversations are productive. A good friend of mine came to my studio one day and had no problem saying, "That kinda sucks." I was grateful because I was at a point where I could no longer determine if it really was bad or if I was just being to hard on myself.
Trust me. I went to art school. You can't say anything worse than what I have already heard.
So tell me, do you want the unvarnished truth about your work or should I just stick with "Interesting approach to your subject!" when I see it?